What is real in this prototype, and what is not

What is real

• The flows, screens and language — these are the product decisions we are asking you to judge.
• The guardrails: no identity numbers, no eligibility decision outside the study team, rewards only for learning.
• Consent as four separate, withdrawable choices, each recorded with who helped.
• Aggregate-only sponsor reporting with groups under five hidden.
• An audit entry for every change you make while clicking around.

What is not real

• Every person, hub, site, sponsor and study is invented. No real organisation is named anywhere.
• Clinical content is illustrative and has not been reviewed by a clinician or an ethics committee.
• Approvals, training videos and reimbursements are simulated in the interface only.
• The assistant answers only from a small approved list. There is no AI and no internet connection.
• Everything is stored on this device. Resetting the demo erases it, including your language and text size.

Still open

• Consent wording is v0.1 — draft, pending legal review (PDPA).
• Per-country consent and e-consent rules are assumptions pending legal review.
• Reward funding, values and the voucher partner are placeholders.
• Support flags are prioritisation aids only, not any kind of clinical or behavioural prediction.

Malay, Tamil, Bahasa Indonesia and Filipino content is partial in this prototype. Underlined text is awaiting a human translator.

Countries in this prototype

• Singapore · emergency 995 · PDPA 2012 · Trial e-consent permitted with paper alternative; remote consent exceptional, with impartial witness (assumption — pending legal review)
• Malaysia · emergency 999 · PDPA 2010 (amended 2024) · Malaysian GCP 5th ed. (2026) — confirm eConsent (assumption — pending legal review)
• Philippines · emergency 911 · Data Privacy Act 2012 · Confirm with ethics committee (assumption — pending legal review)
• Indonesia · emergency 112 · PDP Law 27/2022 · Confirm with ethics committee (assumption — pending legal review)